<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Confused about Who Elected Hamas</title>
	<link>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: organelle</title>
		<link>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-27</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-27</guid>
					<description>Coming from the central command post of mainstream corporate thought -- namely, the New York Times -- &quot;radical&quot; is an insult. I'd say that generally, &quot;radical&quot; isn't a good or bad word, but just depends on the context.

In the context of Teenaged Mutant Ninja Turtles, &quot;radical&quot; is high praise.

As for the Israeli gov't, there's a chance it doesn't have nuclear weapons. And there's also a chance that the TMNT don't really like pizza. Both odds are infinitesimally small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Coming from the central command post of mainstream corporate thought &#8212; namely, the New York Times &#8212; &#8220;radical&#8221; is an insult. I&#8217;d say that generally, &#8220;radical&#8221; isn&#8217;t a good or bad word, but just depends on the context.</p>
	<p>In the context of Teenaged Mutant Ninja Turtles, &#8220;radical&#8221; is high praise.</p>
	<p>As for the Israeli gov&#8217;t, there&#8217;s a chance it doesn&#8217;t have nuclear weapons. And there&#8217;s also a chance that the TMNT don&#8217;t really like pizza. Both odds are infinitesimally small.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>Well if you think about it, radical is quite the compliment.  Just ask my friend &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_%28TMNT%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Leonardo &lt;/a&gt;.  He'd think you were totally cool if you called him radical.  

Also, I think you have a misquote in this: &quot;“the Jewish nuclear-armed group elected to govern the Israelis.”&quot;  According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Countries_with_Nuclear_Weapons#Suspected_nuclear_states&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; this &lt;/a&gt;, I think your quote should be &quot;“the Jewish &lt;i&gt; suspected &lt;/i&gt; nuclear-armed group elected to govern the Israelis.”&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well if you think about it, radical is quite the compliment.  Just ask my friend <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_%28TMNT%29" rel="nofollow"> Leonardo </a>.  He&#8217;d think you were totally cool if you called him radical.  </p>
	<p>Also, I think you have a misquote in this: &#8220;“the Jewish nuclear-armed group elected to govern the Israelis.”&#8221;  According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Countries_with_Nuclear_Weapons#Suspected_nuclear_states" rel="nofollow"> this </a>, I think your quote should be &#8220;“the Jewish <i> suspected </i> nuclear-armed group elected to govern the Israelis.”&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: organelle</title>
		<link>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://organ.blogsome.com/2006/03/03/new-york-times-confused-about-who-elected-hamas/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>I'll add that since I wrote this post, the Times quietly changed the word &quot;militant&quot; to the word &quot;radical.&quot; I guess they can't make up their mind in how to best insult Hamas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll add that since I wrote this post, the Times quietly changed the word &#8220;militant&#8221; to the word &#8220;radical.&#8221; I guess they can&#8217;t make up their mind in how to best insult Hamas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
